Monday, January 17, 2005, 9:43:02 PM, you wrote:
> Danny Ayers wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:38:17 -0500, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>I do believe that it would be possible, and perhaps quite useful, to >>>define an XSLT tranform from Atom/XML to RDF/XML. >> >> >> Yep. Has anyone got one more recent than 0.3? > I'm waiting for the format to stabilize for publishing any mappings; my > guess is that there are some Atom data structures that could see a lot > of churn (links, dates, recursion) unless the consensus becomes 'enough > already'. > Incidently the name AtomIsRDF isn't as problematic as the latent > assumption - that Atom is some of kind of degenerate or special case of > RDF. My opinion is that's a losing strategy if the goal is wider > adoption of RDF. > cheers > Bill I put together a quick hack the other day as an experiment to see if it was possible: http://djpowell.net/tmp/atom2rdf.xsl It supports -04 with PaceExtensionConstruct (treating all Structured Extensions as unknown, but preserving them for round-tripping). It doesn't handle xml:base or xml:lang yet. I'll put it on the Wiki when I've sorted it out, but here it is as a preview. -- Dave
