On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:31:53 -0500, Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tim Bray wrote: > > > > I just read this, and it's moving toward being a usable Pace, but it > > isn't one yet. Could Henry or someone please update it so it has > > *specific* suggestions for language changes to the draft, then we can > > see if it gets consensus support.
Yep, maybe even put Pace in the title just for convention's sake. > "Atom attributes are not in the atom namespace. It is deprecated in rdf > for this to be the case. (so I suppose this means it is still possible)." > > What course of action can we take with that? My guess is there's no will to namespace-qualify all the core attributes. So I reckon the easiest course would be say that each of the attributes has a namespace-qualified shadow with the same meaning. When expressed as an RDF vocabulary, Atom will use these attributes. Whether or not general Atom users should have the option to use these is another question (probably best avoided in this context). Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
