On Jan 27, 2005, at 08:41, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Antone Roundy wrote:On Wednesday, January 26, 2005, at 02:18 PM, Tim Bray wrote:<title type='TEXT'>I do not like <marquee></title> (can't do it)The last one needs to be something like the following, right?
<title type='HTML'>I do <b>not</b> like &lt;marquee></title>
<title type='XHTML'>I do <b>not</b> like <marquee></title>
<title type='XHTML'><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>I do <b>not</b> like <marquee></div></title>
Or, rather:
<title type='XHTML'>I do <b xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>not</b> like <marquee></title>
I was wondering about this as well. When you have @type['XHTML'], does it need to be in a namespace, or not? (Sounds logical, but apparently people do different things.)
Why wouldn't it require the elements that purport to be XHTML elements to be in the XHTML namespace? I do not, however, think that it is useful to restrict type='XHTML' in the content element to have element descendants only from the XHTML namespace. Those who want to do math will mix MathML with XHTML anyway and have it render in a future non-bogotic feed reader Firefox extension (which I expect someone to write sooner or later).
-- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://iki.fi/hsivonen/
