On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:03:09 -1000 (HST), Lucas Gonze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Then my point is moot as long as XHTML inline content may be XHTML 1.0 Transitional. A second argument that inline XHTML may be XHTML 1.0 Transitional is that it satisfies the need for well-formed XML.
You do whatever you please, of course, but HTML and XHTML is not supposed to be used for formatting, but for structure and semantics. That's why <font> et al has been dropped from XHTML 1.1, 2.0 and the Strict DTD's (which is recommended to use over the Transitional ones).
Because having control over presentation is the main reason to format content as HTML.
Uhm. Okay.
-- Asbj�rn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/ �He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away�
