Sam Ruby wrote:

Then I am clearly confused.

At the moment, the feedvalidator would mark an atom feed as invalid if it were served with the text/plan, application/rss+xml, or application/rdf+xml media types. It accepts as valid text/xml (if the feed is either ASCII or a charset is explictly defined), application/xml, or application/atom+xml.

Given this, how should the feedvalidator change (if at all)? How should the spec change (if at all)?


Take a look at this in a browser that does xsl transformations:
http://feeds.feedburner.com/FreeformGoodness

That feed happens to be Atom, but the service lets you target RSS1.0 and RSS2 as well. A large part of that feed's content comes from this feed: http://www.freeke.org/ffg/index.atom, which is served with the Atom media type.

IMHO, the spec and feed validator shouldn't conflate validity with media types, but I understand it's useful as shorthand for less technical people. So, no change to the spec is necessary. I understand you are looking for the spec to guide the validators behavior, but I don't think it should.

Robert Sayre



Reply via email to