On Jan 30, 2005, at 7:10 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
I'm +1 on this, but would be fine if the WG doesn't want to change. Graham's wording is more useful to an implementer who wasn't on the mailing list last year (or was on and skipped over the permathreads).
Ditto.
(Actually I think even having a section with this name is asking for trouble.
We could change it to "Not Dereferencing Identity Constructs"...
How about "Dereferencability of Identity Constructs"?
-- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
