Antone Roundy wrote:
My preferences:
+1: Current draft or PaceAggregationDocument (with or without atom:feed/atom:head and with or without metadata for atom:aggregation (atom:aggregation/atom:head?))
+0.5: PaceFeedRecursive without any more indirection than we already have, and only one level of recursion
-0.8: Real RDF
-1: PaceFeedRecursive as it stands (no extra indirection, but unlimited levels of recursion)
-1.5: "add an attribute to atom:entry that indicates whether it refers to an instance of entry or another feed"
-2: PaceFeedRecursive w/ indirection at atom:feed, atom:entry, and atom:content
Cool, great to getting to know you better.
I'd like to add the following:
vi and Emacs suck equally. Visual Studio is surprisingly elegant when you get to thinking about it.
Scheme and Java suck equally. Common Lisp is surprisingly elegant when you get to thinking about it.
Python and Perl suck equally. Ruby is surprisingly elegant when you get to thinking about it.
OS X and Windows suck equally. Linux is surprisingly elegant when you get to thinking about it.
Robert Sayre
