On 3/2/05 7:18 PM, "Robert Sayre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is better. I guess I just hadn't grok'd the idea of using >> entries to reference feeds, but now that I see the angle brackets I >> get it. > > Yes, feeds are entries. no, feeds are collections, entries describe resources, and while feeds are also resources that only means that entries can describe feeds, not actually be feeds. e.
