Robert Sayre wrote: > I'm not sure they are that antagonistic, but I agree with Paul when he > says they could be added later. If profiles aren't supposed to matter to > "Core Atom" processors, why not put our money where our mouth is and > make profiles declare themselves in their own namespace?
Suppose I want to require that a feed head MUST specify at least one category element for a specific type of use case. (just pulled the example from the air). I want folks to be able to know that I'm using alternative containment requirements. I want everything else to remain the same so that processors that aren't familiar with my modified profile can simply ignore it and process according to the core. Just so I understand exactly what you're thinking on this, how would I handle this using the extension approach? Could you provide some strawman angle brackets?
- James M Snell
