Antone Roundy wrote:
On Tuesday, February 8, 2005, at 05:47 AM, Bill de h�ra wrote:
-1 to using naming it @rel. <feed rel="core"> wouldn't make any sense at all--"The feed's relationship is 'core'." Relationship to what? <feed>...<link rel="core" href="?????" /> likewise makes no sense--[You mean we have to decide?!?. Now!?!]
+1 on the concept. I've seen enough cases in the last week to suggest it's useful.
-1 on "@profile" - use an @rel to hold the content instead. I'm not sure whether atom:feed should get an @rel or whether we should use atom:feed/atom:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That nicely sums up the feelings I have had about @rel. It's a bucket for putting switches into - the implied dispatching is the same whatever it's called.
Why can't @rel be short for @relevance?
cheers Bill
