Julian Reschke wrote:
Unless that suggestion gains better interoperability for Atom, no.
I'll expect more clients to be able to handle XHTML than HTML tag soup. So yes, that would enhance interoperability.
I see no compelling reason to prefer one over the other. I think the draft should be organized the way it is now. This is not a gauntlet[0][1][2] Atom needs to run.
Robert Sayre
[0] http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roadmap/archives/005632.html
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps-cdf-discuss/2004Jun/att-0004/2004jun02.html#topic24.2
[2] http://www.w3.org/2004/04/webapps-cdf-ws/papers/opera.html
