Martin Duerst wrote:
At 19:03 05/02/16, Bill de hãra wrote:
>> As long as it's XML and otherwise conformant, I think it's fine.
>> >Probably not. Do you and Julian and Anne and Henri approve?
>> I don't see how I would want to complain about how you generate
>> your stuff, as long as the result is following the specs.
>
>The point I'm seeing here is that creating markup using string concats is inherently fragile. No surpise there. Wrt namespaces, fragility is eliminated when you stop using defaults (but there are other considerations which keep string concat fragile). Use of div covers off the XHTML case.
Yes, use of div covers that case. But that doesn't mean that if some people want to use div, everybody has to use div.
It does (I've never said otherwise) - there is a div tax.
cheers Bill
