At 08:36 05/03/07, Tim Bray wrote:
>I agree also, but for some implementors, HTML is actually easier, if they are handing a chunk of bytes to an HTML rendering control, they'd rather not reconstruct the syntax from the infoset, they'd rather just take an opaque chunk of bytes. So we really don't have community consensus in favor of XHTML, even though it's obviously cleaner. -Tim
I really hope they don't take an opaque chunk of bytes, because if they do, they'll have no clue about the character encoding.
Regards, Martin.
