On Mar 29, 2005, at 9:47 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
I tried; the official response [1] was that the IESG wanted to see an stable and available spec -- by their standards -- for RSS before putting it in the standards tree. Just doing a registration doesn't cut it.
I worked on an RSS 2.0 I-D [2] for a while and then stopped when I got nervous about change control and copyright issues. Given that RSS 2.0 is now hosted at Harvard, it may be that the IESG will consider that a stable enough ref; if not, I'm not nearly as nervous now that it's under a CC license, and I think I could take a crack at the I-D again...
Should that perhaps be "application/rss2+xml"? There are lots of RSSes.
-Tim
