OK, I observe a lot of people speaking up for <link>-less feeds, presenting some plausible use cases. I observe only Sam speaking up for retaining the compulsory link. I observe at least one person speaking up saying "if it's compulsory I'll generate a fake one", which seems significant to me.
I'm starting to smell possible consensus; are there more people here who agree with Sam? If so, speak up. Also, if dropping <link> is going to break something (haven't heard that yet), someone should please point that out.
Apologies in advance if you already have spoken on this and I missed it. -Tim
- Re: Why is alternate link a MUST? Tim Bray
- Re: Why is alternate link a MUST? Joe Gregorio
- Re: Why is alternate link a MUST? Arve Bersvendsen
- Re: Why is alternate link a MUST? Graham
- Re: Why is alternate link a MUST? Tim Bray
- Re: Why is alternate link a MUST? Robert Sayre
- Re: Why is alternate link a MUST? Arve Bersvendsen
- Re: Why is alternate link a MUS... Robert Sayre
- Re: Why is alternate link a MUST? Graham
- Re: Why is alternate link a MUST? Paul Hoffman
- Re: Why is alternate link a MUS... Tim Bray
