> Correct. I was assuming that, once everything else got approved, you > would put a DISCUSS vote on the document because of the lack of final > namespace. We then ask the W3C for it, get it, tell you, and make the > change to the n+1 version of the document (along with the editorial > comments that often come out of an IESG review). Does that sound > doable?
Yes, we can do it this way. Just please add some text so that so that IESG reviewers understand that this is a known issue that we have a plan to address. -Scott-
