--On April 13, 2005 9:06:59 AM +0300 Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Instead of saying "XHTML" it would be clearer to say "XHTML 1.x" or defining > it > in terms of the XHTML 1.x namespace URI.
This could work. "XHTML 1.0" will not be confused with a media type. When XHTML 2.0 is ready, we can add a supplemental RFC which defines a new attribute value for that. wunder -- Walter Underwood Principal Architect, Verity
