On 4/27/05, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, that's one of the key reasons why I like the MUST for summary. > If somebody invents a popular hoffman:content-plus-plus, then feeds > that include it lieu of atom:content will need to include a human > readable summary that can be used by existing clients.
If they nest a content-plus-plus inside atom:content, they wouldn't have to include that summary, right? Robert Sayre
