On Apr 27, 2005, at 9:05 AM, Sam Ruby wrote (about the proposal to address Bob Wyman's dupes issue):
It would help if a Pace could be written.
Funny you should say that, Sam.
We have another week or so to go on our IETF Last Call, but the volume of input is low enough that Paul & I think we can safely start doing our own internal-issues final cleanup. We've been following the WG discourse as best I can, but the volume is high. Thus, we think that to be fair and transparent, we require a last round of Paces for any/all changes to the format-08 draft.
Sam, perhaps you could have a scan at the current set of Paces and see if any other than PaceOptionalSummary are actually up-to-date and suitable for this last round? (I'd be surprised, but you never know).
I think there are quite a few little things for which I've seen evidence of consensus on the mailing list, in fact I think Rob/Mark have pounced on a couple and they're in -08; but if you're behind one and it isn't, please Pace-i-fy it and let's get with the cleanup. LAST CHANCE, we mean it. And of course we're going to have to fish some sort of consensus out of this horrid summary-required mess. -Tim
