On 4/29/05, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > == Abstract == > > Encourage interoperability and accessibility by suggesting that key > textual constructs be both present and non-empty. >
I'd prefer that a bit more of the rationale made it into the text. Explain why we are saying SHOULD. > > === section 4.1.2 === > > Add: > > atom:entry elements SHOULD contain an atom:summary element if the > atom:content in the form of atomInlineOtherContent. This section needs to be reworked. We can't make normative reference to the RNG. > == Notes == > > In the event that PaceOptionalSummary is adopted, the words "is either > not present or" would need to be added to the proposed addition to > section 4.1.2. -1 to this. If PaceOptionalSummary is adopted, the summary will be a MAY, not a SHOULD. Please put your proposals in the section marked "Proposal". Robert Sayre
