On 2/5/05 1:51 AM, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would +1 allowing identical IDs if it was required that the > entries sharing an ID had different sources. perhaps we need to explain the concept of 'entries' (as resources), as distinct from <entry>s (as representations), and explain that 'entries' must have unique IDs, and that the <atom:id> element of any <atom:entry> ties it back to the 'entry' resource. It would then follow that multiple <entry> representations which happen to have the same <atom:id> value are just different representations of the source 'entry', and possibly even different instantiations in time. e.
