* Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 09:04+0300] > > On May 4, 2005, at 02:56, David Nesting wrote: > > >Plus, "feed" is kind of application-specific. What about "related"? > > It's a spec for discovering *feeds*. It is proper to have an > app-specific rel value to avoid feed-specific apps downloading non-feed > related documents.
What's a feed? 1/2 ;) FWIW in the FOAF spec we currently say: <link rel="meta" type="application/rdf+xml" title="FOAF" href="http://example.com/people/~you/foaf.rdf"; /> (although we shouldn't really be taking over the title attribute...) (we don't really say what a FOAF file is either; pointing to an RSS1 doc that had some use of the FOAF namespace in it too could be reasonable...). Dan
