On May 4, 2005, at 10:43, Eric Scheid wrote:
On 4/5/05 3:52 PM, "fantasai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
'feed' is not really defining a /relation/, it's defining a sort of
meta-content-type... But I would much prefer that to forcing 'alternate'
on non-'alternate' links.
instead of "feed", consider "updates", which gets closer to the gist of the
sense
We all call them feeds and in the end it comes down to picking a string that software uses for comparison. Why all the over-generalization?
-- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
