On 8 May 2005, at 1:43 am, Robin Cover wrote:
I distinguished between minimal and optimal: minimally, I simply asked for 'atom:rights' in place of 'atom:copyright'. How is that harmful (other than to existing implementations that people don't want to change)?
Because "copyright" is the better understood and more widely used term. "rights" is meaningless.
However, I ask you, does this make sense:
<copyright>The corporate entity that owns this Atom document as its intellectual property does not wish to be identified by name, but I, although not the owner, certify that I am empowered to declare that you may legally display the text in your browser, and print it on paper, and display it on any website under your control, provided that you are an employee of a company having fewer than 20 employees as of 2005-05-03.</copyright>
Yes. The "corporate entity that owns this document" would be the copyright holder, non?
Is that a Che Guevara t-shirt you're wearing?
Graham
