Sunday, May 8, 2005, 9:28:08 AM, you wrote:
> Robin: In my opinion, the only place an atom:copyright should appear > is at the feed level, as an assertion of ownership of the feed > document itself. [Disregarding the name and legal meaning of the element...] What about entry documents though, surely they should be allowed a copyright statement? If I understand it correctly, I agree with Bob Wyman's view: "It's all about the Entries, Stupid!". Despite the structure of Atom Feed Documents putting atom:feed at the root, I see feed containment to be just one of many pieces of optional metadata about entries. atom:feed elements currently contain either: a) metadata about the feed or b) metadata about the feed and contained entries, which can be overridden within atom:entry I don't think that we should expand this to c) metadata about the feed and contained entries, which can't be overridden within atom:entry -- Dave
