Should one not then to make atom:update a MAY? We don't really need 2 MUST dates.
Henry
On 16 May 2005, at 00:12, David Powell wrote:
PaceAllowDuplicateIDs received some opposition because of its use of
atom:updated to differentiate multiple revisions of an entry [1][2] [3].
I've posted a couple of Paces - basically a single a proposal, split into two bite-size pieces:
<http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceAllowDuplicateIdsWithModified> <http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceDateModified2>
Apologies in advance. I know what happened last time we discussed dates, and this is hardly the best timing, but it seemed like an obvious fix for the problem.
[1] http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg14738.html [2] http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg14750.html [3] http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg15144.html
-- Dave
