At 2:51 PM -0400 5/24/05, Karl Dubost wrote:
Are you insecure?
Well, I do sometimes worry my protocols aren't as long as those from
other Working Groups, but I try not to think about it.
Where did you read, imagine such a thing?
The case has been settled for a long time by choice of the Atom
Community. No trouble.
OK, good. So why are we discussing where the Atom format document
doesn't match up to W3C test specification guidelines?
Did you miss an email?
No.
[[[I have done the review of Atom 0.8 to ___test___ W3C QA
Specification Guidelines with an external technical document and I
thought it could be also useful to the Atom community.
]]] - http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg15675.html
Right. You didn't say why you thought it would be useful, and then...
and the rest, I'm replying to the questions. :)
That's the part that is confusing. Your responses sound a great deal
like we should be making changes to our documents based on W3C test
guidelines. For what purpose?
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium
