Le 05-05-25 à 13:13, Mark Pilgrim a écrit :
On 5/24/05, Karl Dubost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Validation is something very precise. It can be validated against a
DTD, or against a Schema or another grammar language, etc. At least
the "Feed validator" could become a "Feed checker" which develops a
heuristic to check if the requirements of the specification are
verified. :))) "up to the validator authors" :)
This from the organization that added a "fussy parsing" option
*enabled by default* in their (X)HTML "Validator" for almost 8 months.
To avoid "fussy comment", the W3C Mark-Up Validator exactly.
The W3C Mark-Up Validator is maintained by a wonderful community of
_volunteers_
And I wish we had more perl developers to help us because the main
developers
Terje, Nick, Ville and Olivier
can't do everything.
I wish we could have a Mark-Up checker that would develop also
heuristic to check certain requirements of some mark-up languages
that are not testable by a Schema or DTD validation.
Basically, Mark, you are off-base, it was not a reproach to the feed
validator. Quite the opposite, which I always found being a
remarkable tool.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
