On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 18:39 +0200, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Asbjørn Ulsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-27 13:50]: > > Rename the "atom:uri" element or change its type to a Link > > Construct. > > The problem with that proposal, even if it wasn’t too late to > make any changes, is that, well, it replaces atom:uri with a Link > Construct. > > A Link Construct has more semantics than the atom:uri element is > supposed to.
Whereas the current construct has no semantics to speak of? > > The basic idea to rename the element to something more > descriptive is, of course, not bad. With little, or no, semantics? > But, as mentioned, the spec, modulo bugs, is a done deal at this > point. Which, as was pointed out, is not good for interop Please can we have an informative version of the spec, with the semantics explained. Current version, for thicko's|users, like me, is .... not good. -- Regards, Dave Pawson XSLT + Docbook FAQ http://www.dpawson.co.uk
