I wanted to point out that comments I've made on the application/atom+xml media type registration template have not yet been incorporated into the syntax draft, nor have I received any feedback about why they needn't be.
These are not show-stoppers by any means, but are also not exactly insignificant IMO. The comments are; http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-April/000713.html http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-April/000678.html (the former was sent to the IESG, but again, I received no feedback) Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
