Am 18.07.2005 um 19:33 schrieb Mark Nottingham:
On 18/07/2005, at 1:29 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
I agree that "special" URIs are not that great either. Another idea
might be nested elements:
stateful feed:
<fh:history><fh:prev>http://example.org/thingie1.1</fh:prev></fh:
history>
stateful initial feed: <fh:history/>
stateless feed: <fh:history><fh:none/></fh:history>
Hmm. My thinking was that allowing stateful to be omitted would be
concise and unambiguous; to compare,
stateful feed: <fh:prev>http://example.org/thingie1.1</fh:prev>
stateful initial feed: <fh:stateful>true</fh:stateful>
stateless feed: <fh:stateful>false</fh:stateful>
Fine with me. As I said the discussion has reached the "syntactic
sugar" level and your proposal has the same semantics and no nested
elements. To be clear I would advise clients that fh:prev takes
precedence over any fh:stateful information and then any ambiguity is
resolved.
//Stefan
