On 31/7/05 7:47 AM, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I¹m -1 on using ³replies-source²; I should have said so more
> explicitly before. To me it is non-sensical, as it parses as ³the
> source of replies,² which is the opposite relationship of what
> it¹s supposed to express. It¹s not where the replies come from,
> it¹s where the entries being replied to come from.

"original-replies-target"?

e.


Reply via email to