* Antone Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-31 01:15]: > I could add more, but instead, here's my suggestion for > replacing that sentence: > > If the resource being replied to is an atom:entry, the > value of the href attribute MUST be the atom:id of the > atom:entry. If the value of the type attribute is > "application/atom+xml" then the href attribute MUST be the > (URL/URI/IRI) of an Atom Entry Document containing the > atom:entry being replied to.
This undermines the purpose of the link. Atom Entry Documents can move around; their IDs are eternal. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
