On 5/8/05 1:30 PM, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> * Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-05 04:55]:
>> What if those particular <links> had @rel="in-reply-to", and
>> per that spec would be the <id> URIs. Would updating those URIs
>> be wrong?
> 
> If an atom:id happened to be a dereferencable HTTP URI and
> dereferencing produced 301, what would you do?
> 
> The same answer (ie, nothing at all) applies to ³in-reply-to.²
> Those aren¹t links to a web resource. They¹re IDs, and as such
> eternal.

ah, but how do you know those URIs are id's?

or more specifically, is the following URI an id or a location?

    <link rel="something-you-don't-know" href="..." />

e.


Reply via email to