On 8/9/05, David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Publishers should expect that relative refs used in atom:link will > work, but publishers should expect that relative refs used in Simple > Extensions will break.
Disagree. We have no idea what people will do with this, or where they will be deployed. You're suggesting adding implementation advice, since the content of a simple extension element is not defined as a URI reference. By your logic, we have to explicitly clarify that atom:updated is not subject to xml:base processing. Sorry, I strongly disagree. Robert Sayre
