Paul Hoffman wrote: > > Greetings again. I think we have rough consensus on "emitting with > whitespace around IRIs and dates is an error" and "we should warn folks > that people might emit errors here because this is somewhat subtle". > > If that is true, I propose that, just before section 3.1 (at the end of > the introductory text to "Common Atom Constructs") we add: > > Note that there MUST be no whitespace in a Date construct or in any IRI. > Some XML-emitting implementations erroneously insert whitespace around > values by default, and such implementations will emit invalid Atom.
+1 cheers Bill
