* Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-15 20:15]: > > That uses html:base, which sets the base URI for the entire > > document, not @xml:base, which sets the base URI for the > > element and its children. Your example is irrelevant. > > Oh no, not irrelevance! :) > > Both seem to do the job described in section 5.1.1 of RFC 3986, > "Base URI embedded in content". > <http://rfc.net/rfc3986.html#s5.1.>
Sorry, I misunderstood what you were trying to demonstrate because I mixed it up with the discussion about @xml:base providing a base URI for a subtree of a document only. In other matters, what Sjoerd said. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
