On 30/8/05 12:05 PM, "James M Snell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's kinda where I was going with x:follow="no|yes". An > x:archive="no|yes" would also make some sense but could also be handled > with HTTP caching (e.g. set the referenced content to expire > immediately). x:index="no|yes" doesn't seem to make a lot of sense in > this case. x:follow="no|yes" seems to me to be the only one that makes > a lot of sense. x:index could be used to prevent purely ephemeral dross cluttering up the uber-aggregators. A feed which gives minute by minute weather data for example. robots NOARCHIVE is used by search engines, particularly google, to control whether they present a 'cached' page, which seems sensible. e.