I think this is good, but I would prefer the atom:link to be used
instead of
the fh:prev structure, as that would better fit the atom way of doing
things.
I also think it may be very helpful if we could agree on an extension
name space
that all accepted extensions would use, in order to reduce name space
clutter.
Henry
On 7 Sep 2005, at 01:18, Mark Nottingham wrote:
Feed History -04 is out, at:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-
history-04.txt
Changes:
- fh:stateful -> fh:incremental, with appropriate changes in text
- more explicit cardinality information
- implications of fh:prev being an Absolute URI spelled out
- more explicit white space handling
- Acknowledgements section
More information, including implementation details, at:
http://www.mnot.net/blog/2005/09/05/feed_history
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
