* Byrne Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-13 19:40]:
> In stead, we publish a summary of the post in the <summary>
> element. That's logical enough. We see there being value
> however in being able to communicate to the reader that the
> contents represented by an <entry> element is not a complete
> representation of that entry.

Without atom:content, an atom:entry is not a complete
representation of a resource.

Is there any problem I’m missing?

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Reply via email to