On 10/13/05, Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Point to any text in the spec that backs this up.
The spec says only "The 'atom:content' element either contains or links to the content of the entry." Any assertion that there is no other content to be had is not testable, and therefore rightly excluded from the spec. I don't see what harm the proposed extension could do, but it doesn't sound like something I would implement. What's the benefit? Robert Sayre
