* James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-21 21:25]: > Ok, so thus far: we can indicate resources that are related to > the given entry; we can indicate that an entry is a reply to > another entry; we can specify categories to which the entry > belongs; but there is currently no way of indicating the > *subject* of the entry. > > The best options appear to be: > > a. Use dc:subject (appears to be a perfectly acceptable > solution to me assuming that the subject indication is intended > for human consumption > > or... > > b. Use link[rel="subject"] (which works if the subject is > identified/described by a dereferenceable URI)
Err, are you forgetting atom:category? Doesn’t that satisfy all your wants *and* more? It has a URI, a term and a human-readable label. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
