Antone Roundy wrote: > > On Oct 21, 2005, at 5:47 PM, James M Snell wrote: > >>> Err, are you forgetting atom:category? Doesn’t that satisfy all >>> your wants *and* more? It has a URI, a term and a human-readable >>> label. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >> I dunno, that's why I was asking ;-) >> >> atom:category works well for categorizing entries, but does it really >> tell us what the entry is about? For instance, suppose that I want >> to indicate that an entry is about http://www.ibm.com and file that >> in a category called technology? The categorization of the entry is >> different than the subject of the entry.. tho both are definitely >> related. > > > Why don't we define link/@rel="about" for pointing to a specific > internet resource that an entry is about (a little more specific than > the general case of rel="related"). I know we discussed this before > and in the chaos of trying to hammer the spec out, didn't do it, but I > still think it's a good idea.
-1 to about. The proposal here is saying the feed is subject to the link not that the link is the object of the feed. About can mean either. cheers Bill
