Robert Sayre wrote:
Heh. Twice in one day. That's an unrelated bug.
I suspected it was probably unrelated. I tried to reproduce it with a
simpler case and it didn't have any problems subscribing. I just didn't have
time to experiment any more. If you want another problem to investigate, try
subscribing to this:
http://216.93.169.119/atomtests/simple.atom
There are 2 entries in that feed, but for some reason Thunderbird only shows
1. I can't figure out why.
More to the point, I can't see what you're trying to accomplish here.
You found a way to make a valid Atom feed that's useless. There are
lots of ways to do that.
I'm not sure if you've been following this thread but earlier on it was
asked whether it would be valid and/or safe to include an xml document
fragment in a content element labeled with a MIME type. My hypothesis was
that it was quite likely to work with xhtml document fragments for anyone
that actually supported the type at all. I put together that test so I could
see whether my hypothesis was true. Of the 15 aggregators I tested, 5 failed
to support application/xhtml+xml at all. All the rest were quite capable of
handling document fragments (and some in fact failed when the content wasn't
a document fragment).
In short, I was trying to verify an hypothesis.
Regards
James
