On 1/19/06, Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 20/1/06 12:12 PM, "Robert Sayre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's not a "problem". It works now, and no one is going to run out and > > change the running code. If someone did do "alternate entry", I can > > see implementations getting patches to ignore those. > > and patches for "alternate replies", and patches for "alternate > something-else", and patches for "alternate blah" and patches for "alternate > [anything but blank space]".
Those probably aren't all alternates. > Yep, that's the smart way to write a spec. I think it is. I would be willing to change my mind if a browser implementor agrees with you. -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."
