On Jan 19, 2006, at 9:05 AM, Robert Sayre wrote:


PaceAnchorSupport and PaceDifferentRelValue don't seem very useful,
and they weren't proposed by implementors. The spec is extremely
well-written and reflects existing behavior.

Can we please un-expire this:
http://philringnalda.com/rfc/draft-ietf-atompub-autodiscovery-01.html

and be done?

+1.  Ship it.  -Tim


--

Robert Sayre

"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."


Reply via email to