* David Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-12 13:40]:
> Reasonable implementations will probably just store the latest
> versions of feed and entry metadata, something like this:
Of course, what they *should* do is use `atom:source` so that
they can preserve all of the feed metadata, including RFC4287
Sec.6 extensions:
<entry>
<source>
<author><name>Dave</name></author>
<ex:tag>x</ex:tag>
</source>
<id>...2</id>
</entry>
<entry>
<source>
<author><name>Dave</name></author>
<ex:tag>x</ex:tag>
</source>
<id>...1</id>
</entry>
<entry>
<source>
<author><name>Someone Else</name></author>
<ex:tag>y</ex:tag>
</source>
<id>...4</id>
</entry>
<entry>
<source>
<author><name>Someone Else</name></author>
<ex:tag>y</ex:tag>
</source>
<id>...3</id>
</entry>
(Whether this is wrapped inside `atom:feed` or each entry is
stored separately is not relevant.)
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
