Le Tue, 02 May 2006 23:41:10 +0300, M. David Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
Very cool! Thanks for the prompt reply :)
re: I must make myself very clear, it was *not* my intention to use
improper
version number and to falsely promote Atom 2 support.
My apologies if I came across the wrong way... I wasn't meaning to call
you
out and suggest something evil had taken place... I have just seen things
like this be taken to mean "There's a version two on its way?" or even
something as simple as assuming that in fact, Atom 2 is the current
version
and simply accept, to then propograte this information. I simply wanted
to
make sure that this didn't take place.
Thanks again for the response and for taking the steps to get it fixed!
:)
Hello!
I'm glad this widget description wasn't considered something of an evil
nature :). I consider I made the mistake because of a typo on my behalf
and/or at the moment of writing the description I forgot the Atom version
number (this is because I don't work with feeds too often). I was hurried
to release the widget for their competition.
Yes, I will take the steps to get that fixed, ASAP.
Thanks for the nice reply :).
--
http://www.robodesign.ro
ROBO Design - We bring you the future
