With all of the above, its nice to see that someone has realized a generic feed-reader was MANDATORY if they want any level of mass adoption. This is the first one I have seen in the Opera widget library, so best of luck to you... you deserve some definite extra-credit points for (as far as I know anyway) for being the first off-the-line... If nothing else, theres reward in such knowledge in and of itself, but I hope you win either way :)
On 5/3/06, Mihai Sucan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Tue, 02 May 2006 23:41:10 +0300, M. David Peterson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
> Very cool! Thanks for the prompt reply :)
>
> re: I must make myself very clear, it was *not* my intention to use
> improper
> version number and to falsely promote Atom 2 support.
>
> My apologies if I came across the wrong way... I wasn't meaning to call
> you
> out and suggest something evil had taken place... I have just seen things
> like this be taken to mean "There's a version two on its way?" or even
> something as simple as assuming that in fact, Atom 2 is the current
> version
> and simply accept, to then propograte this information. I simply wanted
> to
> make sure that this didn't take place.
>
> Thanks again for the response and for taking the steps to get it fixed!
> :)
Hello!
I'm glad this widget description wasn't considered something of an evil
nature :). I consider I made the mistake because of a typo on my behalf
and/or at the moment of writing the description I forgot the Atom version
number (this is because I don't work with feeds too often). I was hurried
to release the widget for their competition.
Yes, I will take the steps to get that fixed, ASAP.
Thanks for the nice reply :).
--
http://www.robodesign.ro
ROBO Design - We bring you the future
--
<M:D/>
M. David Peterson
http://www.xsltblog.com/
