On 6/23/06, Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The view I prefer is "follow RFC 2026 because no one is going to remember the logic for not following it after the RFC is published." Yes, I'm a bit of a priss about these things...
I'm alarmed that this specification is on the standards track in a vendor-controlled namespace. <http://purl.org/maint/search_user.pl.cgi?userid=^JASNELL$> I notice Sam Hartman raised this point in IESG discussion, but I don't see a record of its resolutoin. What were the procedures followed, and how can it be said that the IETF has change control here? -- Robert Sayre
